It's AI Review

It's AI estimates how likely a piece of text is to have been written by a large language model. You paste text (200 characters minimum) or upload PDF, DOCX or TXT files, and it returns an AI score; the Deep AI Scan breaks the text into sentences and highlights which parts look machine-written. Paid plans add a plagiarism checker against online sources, and every plan includes a grammar checker, shareable reports, usage statistics and downloadable PDF certificates.

It works on the website, through a Chrome extension that checks highlighted text on any page, and through a ChatGPT plugin, Zapier, Canvas LMS and a documented API with a Python SDK. Detection is offered in English, Arabic, Spanish, French and German. The operator is ITSAI TECHNOLOGIES - FZCO, based in Dubai Silicon Oasis, United Arab Emirates. Its Terms describe results as probabilistic and say they are not definitive proof that a text was AI-generated.

Cost per 1,000 words on monthly billing: Plus $0.06 ($9 / 150), Premium $0.05 ($15 / 300), Pro $0.05 ($25 / 500). Enterprise top-ups work out to $0.095 per 1,000 words ($9.50 / 100). The pricing table gives word allowances without saying whether they reset monthly, except the education plan, which says per month; the free plan's 4,000 words is shown as a remaining balance. Annual billing saves about 20%. The Terms say subscription fees are non-refundable except where the law requires, and cancellation takes effect at the end of the billing cycle.

Prices checked on the vendor's pricing page on November 3, 2026. See It's AI pricing.

What It's AI lists on its homepage, accuracy page and Chrome Web Store listing:

It's AI suits teachers, editors and hiring managers who want a low-cost detector with sentence-level detail, file batches and a certificate they can attach to a report, and schools that would rather pay per student than per teacher seat. The $9 Plus plan is among the cheaper ways to get 150,000 words of scans plus a plagiarism check, and the Arabic, French, German and Spanish support is broader than many detectors.

No detector is proof on its own; the vendor's Terms say so, and false positives on human writing are the main risk in academic settings. Institutions that need LMS integration with established submission workflows may prefer Turnitin. Buyers who want a detector with more independent benchmarking and a larger review base may look at Pangram, GPTZero or Originality.ai.

There is little independent user feedback yet. The Chrome Web Store listing shows a 5.0 rating from only 3 ratings and about 260 users. Most coverage found, such as articles on Tao Daily and TechBullion, reads as press releases repeating the vendor's 99% accuracy claim. The vendor's accuracy page cites a 98.3% result on the public RAID leaderboard, a top ROC-AUC in the MGTD study published by WASET and a 0.8% false positive rate on the ASAP 2.0 student-essay set; it does not say who ran the ASAP evaluation, and these are English-only results.