Skip to content
Stork.AIstork.ai

Tag

#aeo

17 posts

What Is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)? The Measured Guide
AI Research

What Is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)? The Measured Guide

Generative engine optimization (GEO) is making your content likely to be retrieved, used and cited when AI systems generate answers. The KDD 2024 paper that coined the term measured what works across 10,000 queries: quotations +41%, statistics +40%, cited sources +30–40%, keyword stuffing ~nothing — and rank-5 sites gained +115% while top-ranked sites lost 30%. What the paper found, what we've measured running a six-engine monitor (ChatGPT grounded only ~74% of calls), and the two-halves playbook: liftable content on your site, retrievable coverage everywhere else.

Read article→
What Is llms.txt? The Spec, the Skeptics, and Whether to Bother
Tutorials

What Is llms.txt? The Spec, the Skeptics, and Whether to Bother

llms.txt is Jeremy Howard's September 2024 proposal: a markdown file at /llms.txt giving language models a curated map of your site. Google's John Mueller says no major AI service uses it — server logs show crawlers don't even request it — comparing it to the keywords meta tag. The precise spec, the honest adoption picture, the steel-manned case against, and the calibrated verdict: spend ten minutes publishing one as a courtesy, then spend the real hour on the measurable levers.

Read article→
Profound Alternatives in 2026, Sorted by Your Situation
Comparisons

Profound Alternatives in 2026, Sorted by Your Situation

Profound is the enterprise reference brand for AI visibility monitoring — which is why people shop for alternatives. The map by situation: Peec and Otterly for mid-market, Semrush/SE Ranking/Surfer's new $158 AI Search Analytics plan if you'd rather extend a suite, open-source Elmo to self-host free, Scrunch-inside-Sitecore for CMS-led enterprises, and a free ten-second check before spending anything — gated by three measured tests (grounding ~74%, counts-are-floors, receipts) that the ranking listicles skip.

Read article→
Best AI Visibility Tools in 2026 (AEO/GEO) — With the Numbers Vendors Don't Show
Comparisons

Best AI Visibility Tools in 2026 (AEO/GEO) — With the Numbers Vendors Don't Show

AEO, GEO and 'AI visibility' are three names for one category, and the tools all promise the same dashboard. From running our own six-engine monitor in production: measuring one question across six engines costs 24.5¢ at vendor-billed rates, ChatGPT's API only browses the web on ~74% of calls, and corpus mention counts invert against live answers at both ends. The tier map, the measured cost table, and the five questions that separate real monitors from vibes.

Read article→
ChatGPT Ads Can't Buy the Sentence That Sells
Industry Insights

ChatGPT Ads Can't Buy the Sentence That Sells

An r/marketing thread is full of advertisers reporting bad ChatGPT ad results at a $47 CPM. The CPM is the market rate and not the problem. OpenAI's own policy pages explain the rest: ads are architecturally separate from the answer and cannot influence it, they never reach Plus/Pro/Business/Enterprise/Edu subscribers, and the current test is limited to consumer verticals with everything else disallowed at launch — which is why the B2B advertisers are the ones complaining.

Read article→
How Much Does AI Reputation Management Cost in 2026?
Comparisons

How Much Does AI Reputation Management Cost in 2026?

AI reputation management in 2026 splits into four price tiers: one-shot audits ($9–99), self-serve monitoring (~$3–30/mo), AEO monitoring platforms like Profound, Otterly and Peec ($89–499/mo), and full-service ORM agencies ($1,500–10,000/mo). The costliest mistake is buying the wrong tier — most small businesses should start with a one-shot report, not a retainer. Here's what each tier actually buys and who should pay for it.

Read article→
When AI Lies About Your Business: Fixing AI Hallucinations About Your Brand
Industry Insights

When AI Lies About Your Business: Fixing AI Hallucinations About Your Brand

AI regularly states false things about businesses as fact — wrong prices, features you don't ship, a competitor's incidents merged into yours, controversies that never happened. Audits find factual errors for 72% of brands checked, and a real Google AI Overview hallucination cost one solar company a $150,000 contract. You can't edit the model and platform-report routes are weak; the honest fix is correcting the public sources AI cites. Here's how to detect it across every engine and remediate it for real.

Read article→
Profound vs Otterly vs Peec: Which AI Visibility Tool Is Worth It? (2026)
Comparisons

Profound vs Otterly vs Peec: Which AI Visibility Tool Is Worth It? (2026)

Profound, Otterly, Peec, Scrunch and AI Peekaboo are the names that come up when you shop AI visibility monitoring — and they serve very different buyers. Profound is enterprise (custom, five-figure/yr); Scrunch, acquired by Sitecore in June 2026, starts at $250/mo; Peec is mid-market ($95–495/mo); Peekaboo ($50+) targets agencies; Otterly is the cheapest entry ($29+). We compare 2026 pricing, engine coverage and the add-on fees that quietly double the bill, then make the honest case for the wedge: if you just need a baseline, a $29 one-shot report beats a subscription you may never act on.

Read article→
Does ChatGPT Recommend Your Product? How to Check (and What to Do)
Tutorials

Does ChatGPT Recommend Your Product? How to Check (and What to Do)

Want to know if ChatGPT names your product when buyers ask category questions? Here are the exact prompts to run across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Grok — plus the real limits of DIY checking (answers vary 99 times out of 100), how to read the results as share-of-voice, and the slow, honest work that actually moves AI answers. Stork's $29 report is the fast, multi-engine version of the same check.

Read article→
"Get Your Brand Into ChatGPT" Is Mostly a Scam — Here's the Proof
Industry Insights

"Get Your Brand Into ChatGPT" Is Mostly a Scam — Here's the Proof

Agencies are cold-emailing businesses: 'your competitors show up in ChatGPT and you don't — pay us to fix it.' Most of it is a scam wearing new letters. The proof: you can't pay to get listed in ChatGPT (no submission form), no one can guarantee a non-deterministic model's output, one company paid $50k for six months and got zero AI traffic, and Google now routes deceived businesses to the FTC. Real AI visibility exists — but it's slow SEO and PR, never a guarantee. Plus a 60-second scam filter.

Read article→
AI Reputation Management in 2026: What Actually Works (and What's Snake Oil)
Industry Insights

AI Reputation Management in 2026: What Actually Works (and What's Snake Oil)

AI reputation management splits in two: measuring what ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude say about you (real and cheap) and 'fixing' it (where the snake oil lives). You can't pay to get listed in ChatGPT, no one can guarantee an AI output, and Google now points deceived businesses to the FTC. What actually moves AI answers is slow, honest work — consistent facts, credible coverage, clear pages. Here's the honest map: what works, what it should cost by tier, and how to hire without getting robbed.

Read article→
← Stork.AI Blog