The IPO bargain: buy in, but don’t call the shots
Public investors may soon buy into Anthropic, but a viral video from Matthew Berman highlights a critical catch: the ability to buy shares does not equate to voting power. Berman’s analysis, based on Anthropic’s preliminary S-1 filing, points to a governance structure designed to insulate founders from external influence.
This tension sits at the core of Anthropic’s reported dual-class share structure. The IPO intends to offer Class A common stock to the public, representing economic interest but minimal governance. A separate Class F common stock, held by an entity called Founder LLC, is designed to command an aggregate 50.1% of the total voting power.
Founder LLC represents CEO Dario Amodei and his six co-founders, including Daniela Amodei, Chris Olah, and Jack Clark. Crucially, the Class F share carries no economic value; its sole function is to ensure a permanent 50.1% majority on shareholder matters, regardless of economic equity. This mechanism effectively immunizes the founding group against dilution.
While Berman's video unpacks these prospective terms with concern, investors must verify all details against Anthropic’s actual, current SEC filings. The preliminary S-1, filed under the intended Nasdaq ticker ANT, outlines these provisions, but offering terms can evolve. This initial filing reveals a deliberate architectural choice prioritizing founder control over traditional public shareholder influence.
Class F breaks the usual link between cash and control
Anthropic’s S-1 filing reveals a truly audacious mechanism: a single Class F common stock issued to Founder LLC, an entity representing CEO Dario Amodei and his six co-founders. This Class F share carries no economic value, yet it’s engineered to command 50.1% of total voting power, regardless of the founders' actual equity stake. Berman calls this "wild," and he’s right.
This structure starkly deviates from familiar dual-class arrangements, where founders often retain extra votes through shares they personally own. Here, control is explicitly detached from capital at risk. While individual founders hold only about 2% of ordinary equity, and have pledged up to 80% to philanthropy, the Class F share ensures their permanent majority on shareholder matters, effectively immunizing them against dilution.
The consequence for a would-be public shareholder is clear: buying Anthropic’s Class A common stock offers exposure to the company’s anticipated $1 trillion-plus valuation and explosive revenue growth—$16.3 billion in H1 2026 alone—without a commensurate say in its direction. You get to ride the wave of gains (or losses) from Claude’s enterprise adoption, but you don't get to steer the ship.
This outsized Class F control only sunsets if the founder group dwindles to two or fewer active founders for an extended period. This isn't just about insulating leadership from Wall Street’s profit pressures; it’s about a deliberate, structural separation of ownership and influence, enshrined from day one.
The safety case—and the shareholder-rights cost
Anthropic’s leadership will undoubtedly frame this novel governance as a bulwark for AI safety. The argument is compelling: insulating core mission from the relentless, often short-sighted pressure to maximize near-term shareholder returns allows for responsible, long-term development of powerful AI. This perspective suggests that crucial ethical guardrails and deliberate deployment strategies might be compromised if every decision were subject to a vote driven purely by profit motives.
However, the cost to public investors is stark. Contributing capital to a company with a projected valuation between $1 trillion and $1.5 trillion typically comes with a reasonable expectation of governance influence. Anthropic’s Class F structure, alongside the independent Long-Term Benefit Trust (LTBT), effectively disenfranchises those providing the public-market capital. Investors will have limited ability to challenge corporate strategy, influence board appointments, or hold decision-makers accountable through traditional voting mechanisms.
The S-1 filing itself provides a critical lens for understanding this trade-off. It explicitly warns that mission commitments may conflict with financial interests. This isn’t boilerplate; it’s a direct disclosure of a potential conflict, amplified by the Class F voting power structure. Investors must weigh this fundamental tension, recognizing that their financial stake may not translate into a voice when mission priorities diverge from quarterly earnings. For full details on these disclosures, investors should consult the official Anthropic, PBC SEC Filings (Form S-1).
Enjoying this? Get one like it in your inbox each morning.
one email a day · unsubscribe in two clicks · no third-party tracking
Before buying, follow the votes—not just the valuation
Class F, held by Founder LLC, is only one piece of Anthropic’s intricate governance puzzle. The S-1 also details a Long-Term Benefit Trust (LTBT), which holds Class T shares specifically designated to elect and oversee a majority of the board of directors. Public investors face a double insulation: no general shareholder voting power and no standard board recall ability.
Before buying, scrutinize the final prospectus, not just the headline valuation. Investors must examine:
- Voting rights by share class
- who gets control of Founder LLC
- Board-election rules for the LTBT
- Sunset triggers for Class F
- Provisions allowing changes to these mechanisms
Decide if Anthropic’s business prospects, like its $16.3 billion revenue in H1 2026, justify a valuation between $1 trillion and $1.5 trillion when public ownership comes with such limited governance. Excitement around Claude’s enterprise adoption or a colossal IPO projection is no substitute for understanding the terms. Follow the votes, not just the valuation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Anthropic’s Class F stock?
The described Class F structure gives a founder-linked entity voting power designed to equal 50.1% of the total, despite the share having no economic value.
Would public investors have voting power in Anthropic?
Public investors could hold Class A shares, but their influence over shareholder decisions would be limited if the Class F arrangement operates as described.
Why would Anthropic separate voting power from economic ownership?
The structure can insulate decisions about safety and long-term strategy from short-term market pressure, while also limiting ordinary shareholder influence.
What does the Long-Term Benefit Trust do?
The Trust is described as a separate governance body with a role in electing and overseeing a majority of Anthropic’s board.