View all AI news articles

Navigating the Copyright Maze in Generative AI: A Growing Concern

February 27, 2024

Introduction

Generative AI is revolutionizing various industries, but it's also stirring up a hornet's nest of copyright issues. Recently, renowned authors like George R.R. Martin and organizations like the Authors Guild have filed lawsuits against OpenAI. They claim that OpenAI's popular chatbot, ChatGPT, was trained on their copyrighted works without permission. But OpenAI isn't alone in facing these challenges.

The Runway Dilemma

Anastasis Germanidis, a co-founder of Runway, a company specializing in generative AI tools for video, mentioned that they are still figuring out the right way to train AI models without infringing on artists' copyrights. Runway is actively collaborating with artists to find the best solutions and is considering various data partnerships to develop future AI models. However, the company has been tight-lipped about the data sources they use for training their models, including Gen-2, which can generate videos from text prompts.

Legal Battles Galore

Over the past year, several artists have sued companies like Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt, claiming that their AI models were trained on copyrighted works. Getty Images has also filed a lawsuit against Stability AI for allegedly copying millions of copyrighted images.

Fair Use or Foul Play?

Some companies argue that their activities fall under the "fair use" doctrine, at least in the U.S. However, this is a gray area that is yet to be definitively resolved. To mitigate future legal risks, some companies have introduced options for artists to opt out of model training. OpenAI, for instance, recently created a channel for artists to inform the company if they don't want their artwork used for training AI models.

The Other Side of the Coin

What about copyrighting AI-generated works? The U.S. Copyright Office has recently started seeking public comments on this issue, but there's still a lack of clear guidelines. Germanidis from Runway believes that content generated by their platform can be copyrighted, although they haven't formalized this into a policy yet.

Conclusion

The copyright landscape in the realm of generative AI is complex and evolving. Companies are taking various approaches to navigate this tricky terrain, but legal challenges are far from over. As AI continues to advance, the industry needs to find a balanced solution that respects both creators and innovators.

FAQ

Q: What is the "fair use" doctrine?

A: The "fair use" doctrine is a legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders. However, its applicability in the context of generative AI is still under debate. Learn more about Fair Use

Q: How are companies like Runway addressing copyright issues?

A: Runway is actively working with artists and considering various data partnerships to train their AI models responsibly. They are also exploring options like allowing artists to opt out of model training.

Q: Can AI-generated works be copyrighted?

A: The U.S. Copyright Office is still seeking public comments on this issue, and there's no clear-cut answer yet. Some companies like Runway believe that AI-generated content can be copyrighted, but this is still a gray area.

Recent articles

View all articles